I’ll say it again: Trump hates fat women, so be warned. I probably should have come out with this earlier, but frankly, I haven't been watching the rallies until recently. Time to spill the beans…
It's funny that people don't connect the dots. Trump is a womanizer. He’s powerful, rich, and used to be charming and good-looking. He can own every man’s dream: to be surrounded by gorgeous women.
I'm a New Yorker, so I've been in rooms, restaurants, for example, where he was attended by beautiful, tall, slim women in expensive stilettos. Great hair. No bad hair days with this crowd. And couture threads to die for!
What better example than The Donald’s daughter. I stood next to her at the opening of the New York City Ballet. She's breathtaking. The most perfect body, not even a half ounce of anything extra. Her posture is as good as the ballerinas on stage. Perfection. As an 83-year-old who learned the mantra attributed to the Duchess of Windsor, “You can’t be too thin or too rich,” she embodies it.
But not so his female supporters, one of whom was interviewed on television. Let me describe her: average height, dowdy, plump, and dressed in a 100% polyester outfit with a big cross necklace. She was ardent in her praise of the man, admiring him as if he's the coming savior. For Trump, she’s okay at a rally, but he wouldn’t want to be near her anywhere else. Not even in private. No interest in her privates.
I know stuff about The Donald because in the 80s when Tony Schwartz was writing The Art of the Deal, the book that led to The Apprentice, we were both serving on the Board of our Riverside Drive cooperative. We spent time together, and Tony was spending time with Trump. You get the idea.
If Trump makes it to the White House again, will he take action on the size issue? Will he mandate annual waistline measurement, which has been law in Japan since 2008? What is their obesity rate? 3.8%. What's ours? Well, the average American woman has a 38.7-inch waistline, and 35” is obese. So obviously, ours is NOT 41% as the CDC wants us to believe. Probably closer to 60%. Now I know you're thinking that is not right; but the 41% is based on fraudulent numbers resulting from the 1985 debacle where the CDC threw out the HAMWI formula and substituted a fake BMI. Back then, if you were a 5’6” 160-pound woman, you would be counted as obese. So that wasn't good for the food business. Thus the grading on a curve change, and now 5’6” is obese at 186 pounds, and everyone is happier—until there is a Diabetes or Covid diagnosis.
Now, of course, I hear you saying, this is crazy. Trump is fat, but is is the wrong verb tense. He is no longer fat; he probably dropped 30 lbs. Maybe it's because of the O. Not Oprah, but Ozempic. But regardless, he did it and he's not fat anymore. And anyway, even if he were, he has different standards for men and women, right? And he hates fat women. Believe me, he really does.
If he does get elected, he won't be able to make any new laws about this issue until the end of January. So there’s time to size down. And the best way to do it, obviously, is with 80Bites, the natural Ozempic. If you want to start with the drugs, let's buy American so Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro and Wegovy is the ticket. Plus, soon pills will replace shots, and they will be better and cheaper.
Parasetter® is the #1 product besides 80 Bites. Everyone loves it; anybody can use it. You lie there and breathe, and it brings down cortisol levels. We know unbalanced cortisol is the hormone that creates hunger issues. Cortisol speaks to your brain, tells you that you're hungry, and even if you're not hungry, you feel hungry—and well, on and on and on. Just a vicious cycle.
Anyway, there’s time. And maybe he won’t win. But let’s not take any chances.
Does anyone find it odd that no obesity expert anywhere in the World can plausibly explain what caused the global obesity/diabetes epidemic? In my view, the most likely explanation has to do with changes in animal husbandry. Excerpt from Page 56 of 'Omega Balance' by Australian zoologist Anthony Hulbert, PhD (2023) "The contribution of “pork and poultry” to animal-sourced foods was 20 percent in 1961 and 41 percent in 2018…Between 1961 and 2018 there was a dramatic worldwide increase in the supply of fats from sources that have very low omega balances. Fat from “pork and poultry” was greatest in North America for the entire 1961-2018 period, while for Australia and South America, the contribution from “pork and poultry” was the World average level in 1961 and showed the greatest absolute increases (about 16 g) over this period to be similar to North America and Europe in 2018. There was negligible change in Africa over this period."
Here's a clue as to what made the food supply obesogenic. "It is true that the vast advancement in technological developments has led to a reduction in physical activity worldwide, but as obesity now involves infants and the populations of developing countries, this obesity pandemic cannot be attributed to this alone. In addition, laboratory and other domesticated animals have also been subject to the increased prevalence of obesity, despite having largely unchanged living conditions for many years." https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/41405
Steve Blechman explains why the Mediterranean style dietary approach consistently produces favorable results. "The Mediterranean diet is low in arachidonic acid and rich in healthy fats such as monounsaturated fats found in extra-virgin olive oil (EVOO), nuts and omega-3 fatty acids from fish, which has been shown to lower the risk of inflammation, heart disease, cancer, diabetes and obesity, and other degenerative diseases." dvancedmolecularlabs.com/blogs/news/new-red-meat-study-controversy
Another clue as to where the problem lies. "Endocannabinoids and their G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) are a current research focus in the area of obesity due to the system's role in food intake and glucose and lipid metabolism. Importantly, overweight and obese individuals often have higher circulating levels of the arachidonic acid-derived endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) and an altered pattern of receptor expression. Consequently, this leads to an increase in orexigenic stimuli, changes in fatty acid synthesis, insulin sensitivity, and glucose utilisation, with preferential energy storage in adipose tissue." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3677644/